CWA Activism: Proposition 135

Title

CWA Activism: Proposition 135

Description

The items in this collection document the CWA's efforts to prevent Proposition 135 from becoming law. Proposition 135 was introduced to the California ballot in 1990. This law would have increased taxes on beer, wine, and distilled spirits. The CWA argued there were hidden costs in the proposal, and that the alcohol beverage industry, one of the largest agricultural products in California, would be negatively and dramatically impacted. At the time, the industry made $800 million annually. With the new law, the CWA proposed that the sales of alcohol would decrease by ten to twenty-five percent; a $123 million reduction. Also, nearly 2000 agricultural workers would lose their jobs. Additionally, the CWA argued that the programs proposed in the bill were “pet programs,” that would not benefit California consumers; especially as only three percent would be devoted to drunk driving prevention programs. Ultimately Proposition 135 was defeated.


To view all of the items in this collection, in addition to the items featured below, click on VIEW THE ITEMS IN CWA ACTIVISM: PROPOSITION 135 link below.

Collection Items

7 Reasons Why Farmers Should Vote No on Prop 134
"Read the small print in Proposition 134. Once you do you'll see that this proposition is seriously flawed and could have a negative impact on all California taxpayers."

"Local Farmers Rally for No on Prop 135"
"Colusa County Farm Bureau members Kathy Wells (left), Marion Mathis (center) and Carole Hamilton prepare signs urging 'yes' on Proposition 135, which will be on the Nov. 6 ballot. The members say that Prop 135 is the reasonable, scientific approach…
View all 2 items